|
|
||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Rewarding for you and us Defeat Diabetes Foundation Defeat Diabetes
Foundation 150 153rd Ave, Suite 300 Madeira Beach, FL 33708 |
A View of the Glycemic Index from the TrenchesPosted: Monday, February 09, 2004 By Johanna Burani, MS, RD, CDE
The glycemic index (GI) is back in circulation again! Truth be told, it never did go away. Since its initial design in 1981, countless research publications across the globe continue to attest to its efficacy. Inexplicably, however, the American medical diabetes community has been reluctant to endorse its application. As a nutrition consultant in a long-standing private practice based on the use of the glycemic index, I would like to give an insider’s view of what it is and how well it has worked for thousands of my patients. In fact, I consider this an obligation to my colleagues. The Glycemic Index: What is it?It is a ranking system of high carbohydrate (CHO) foods based on their acute glycemic impact. The GI categorizes carbs by their physiologic response rather than by their chemical composition. Translation: it estimates the postprandial blood glucose (BG) excursion of the food. Why does it only rank carbohydrates? Because carbohydrates are the body’s fuel of choice, and, therefore, have the greatest effect on blood glucose levels after eating. This concept was first developed by Drs. David Jenkins and Thomas Wolever while researching the best foods for diabetes control. The Glycemic Index: How is it measured?Like all research, there is strict protocol to follow when testing foods for the glycemic index: The Glycemic Index: What is the controversy?Current nutrition recommendations from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) for all persons with diabetes include considering the total amount of CHO eaten as more important than the source or type. Glycemic index research from Canada, Australia, the UK and Europe, South Africa, and Israel (to give a partial list) affirms that the type of CHO does affect postprandial BG excursions. That is to say, high GI foods cause a rapid spike in BG levels, while low GI foods release glucose into the bloodstream more slowly. Although in 1984, the ADA supported using the glycemic index, it later rescinded its endorsement. The argument is that there are no apparent differences in postprandial BG levels when a particular carbohydrate is consumed within a mixed meal. Research literature provides an extensive and impressive list of published articles that disputes this criticism. . It is an easy tool to use because most low GI foods are commonly found in supermarkets. Also, these same low GI foods (whole grain breads, old fashioned rolled oats, and sweet potatoes, for example) are touted for other health benefits (heart health, anti-cancer properties, weight loss, etc.). My patients seem motivated to make the changes they trust will improve their general health as well as their diabetes. Then, once they start feeling and seeing and the results of low GI eating – my diabetic patients test four times a day, including pre- and two-hour-post prandially - the numbers speak for themselves, and they become committed to their low GI meal plan. Frequently, my patients are able to reduce or even eliminate their diabetes medications, including insulin, once they have learned how to lower their glycemic response to their carbohydrate intake by opting for low GI choices. And benefits of low GI foods are not just limited to diabetic control. Many patients improve their cardiac profiles by lowering their lipids and blood pressure. I have found it unbeatable for weight loss too – one patient lost 195 pounds in two years of low GI eating! Yes, the glycemic index works, sometimes dramatically! The Glycemic Index: Does it have a future?The answer is a resounding “Yes!” The American Diabetes Association and glycemic index research are moving toward a common ground: glycemic load. That is to say, that both groups are pointing to the importance of the total amount of carbohydrate absorbed, the “glycemic load” (albeit from different perspectives). ADA explains that by successfully limiting the total amount of carbs consumed, the glycemic load will be controlled and the resulting BG level will not spike. GI research ascertains that low GI carbs control the glycemic load because of how slowly they are absorbed. In addition, because low GI carbs are more satiating, they are a great tool for limiting total amount of carbs consumed. Herein converges our current understanding of carbohydrate metabolism and BG control. The Glycemic Index: How to start using it?When designing a meal plan for your patients, choose 45-65% of total calories primarily from the low or intermediate section of the glycemic index. This is not to say that high GI foods should not be eaten; a good rule of thumb is: the higher the GI, the smaller the portion. This, in fact, is exactly how you control the glycemic load! And this, in fact, is exactly why low GI foods wind up prevailing: the patient can eat larger quantities without a glycemic overload! Distribute the remainder of the calories as you would for a healthy balanced diet. To learn more about the glycemic index, look for Good Carbs, Bad Carbs or a book series called The Glucose Revolution. Clear, interesting hands-on information awaits you, your practice and, of course, the patients you want to help. You can also go to www.biochem.usyd.edu.au/~jennie/GI/glycemic_index.html where you will find an index and search engine for all foods Ms. Burani has worked with leading international scientists researching the glycemic index for the past six years and after contributing to 11 books has recently authored her new book “Good Carbs, Bad Carbs”. Her book was just selected this year’s #1 diet book by Self Magazine. Source: Diabetes In Contol |
Join us on Facebook
Costa Rica Travel Corp. will donate a portion of the proceeds to and is a sponsor of Defeat Diabetes Foundation.
![]() Send your unopened, unexpired test strips to:
|
|
|