You have reached an outdated page.
Please visit the Defeat Diabetes Foundation's new Web site at:
http://www.DefeatDiabetes.org
Defeat Diabetes: Walking Downhill Lowers Blood Sugar, Uphill Lowers Cholesterol Levels

Home

About Diabetes

Complications

Warning Signs

Screening Test

Donate Now

E-Lerts
Index

Latest News

Diabetes Terms

Health & Fitness

Online Press Center

Meet Mr. Diabetes®

Wake Up And Walk® Tour

Headlines & Stories

About Us - Contact Info

Message Board

Links

 

Walking Downhill Lowers Blood Sugar, Uphill Lowers Cholesterol Levels
posted November 30, 2004

Triglycerides were lowered only by walking uphill and glucose tolerance was most improved by walking downhill.

If you are too weak, unfit or heavy to embark on an exercise program, you should try walking downhill. Walking downhill is good for lowering your blood glucose levels, say Austrian researchers. Walking uphill reduces triglycerides - these are important components of cholesterol.

Dr. Heinz Drexel, Voralberg Institute, Feldirch, Austria, says that walking downhill may be a good starting point for sedentary people to start exercising. It is much easier and it does you a lot of good.

Drexel says that walking downhill reduces the risks (effects) of diabetes. Drexel carried out his research in the Austrian Alps.

Results of a randomized, crossover study in sedentary adults suggest that both concentric and eccentric muscle exercise have beneficial effects on lipid and glucose metabolism, suggesting that both walking up and down inclines can be heart healthy.

The study results were discussed at a press conference at the American Heart Association (AHA) 2004 Scientific Sessions. Lead investigator Heinz Drexel, MD, from the Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment in Feldkirch, Austria, stated that, although the study was done in the Alps, a similar exercise benefit "could be achieved by walking up and down several flights of stairs or by using exercise equipment that is designed for both concentric and eccentric workouts."

Dr. Drexel and colleagues randomized 45 healthy, sedentary, nondiabetic volunteers to either two months of hiking up mountains (concentric exercise) or two months of hiking down mountains (eccentric exercise). Participants were instructed to exercise at least three to five times per week. After two months, patients were crossed over to the other exercise program.

When the volunteers hiked up the mountain, they took a cable car down the mountain, and when they hiked down, they took a cable car up. The cable car was useful, said Dr. Drexel, because the researchers used cable car ticket stubs as one measure of compliance. Volunteers were also asked to complete exercise diaries.

At baseline and after each exercise period a full metabolic profile including an oral lipid tolerance test and an oral glucose tolerance test was obtained.

Dr. Drexel said that he and his colleagues expected that only concentric exercise would show benefit, but "the results were surprising. Triglycerides were lowered only by concentric exercise, while glucose tolerance was most improved by eccentric exercise, and both concentric and eccentric improved low-density lipoprotein (LDL) [cholesterol]," he said.

The concentric improvement in the area under the curve for triglyceride levels was 11.0%, which was significant at P = .037. The eccentric improvement in the area under the curve for glucose levels was improved by 8.2% (P = .027).

Concentric exercise reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 10.2% (P < .001), and eccentric exercise reduced them by 8.9% (P = .001), Dr. Drexel said.

Raymond Gibbons, MD, chairman of the AHA scientific program committee, said at the press conference that the study may make him rethink his daily routine. "I regularly walk up the stairs to my office and then take the elevator down. This study suggests that I should change that practice," said Dr. Gibbons, a professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

" While Dr. Drexel said the findings suggest that a downhill exercise program might be a good option for people at risk for diabetes or people with type 2 diabetes, Dr. Smith said the evidence of one small study does not support such a recommendation.

Source: Diabetes In Control.com: AHA 2004 Scientific Sessions: Abstract 3826. Presented Nov. 10, 2004.

November 2004 News Article Index

Free Diabetes E-Lerts™ Newsletter:  Subscribe


   
To Change, Or Even Help Save The Lives Of Millions Of People,
Consider Making a Donation to Defeat Diabetes Foundation - Thank You! 

Home - About Diabetes - Complications - Warning Signs - Screening Test - Donate Now - Special Events - Latest News - Health & Fitness - Online Press Center - E-Lerts Index - Meet Mr. Diabetes® - Wake Up And Walk® Tour - About Us - Diabetes Terms - Site SearchYour Diabetes ProfileMessage Board - Privacy Policy - Legal Notices - How to Contact Us - Comments form - Suggestion Form - Our E-Mail Addresses - Our Address and Phone Numbers - Links - Contact Us

To be sure and come back to keep up with all the Latest News and important information for diabetics - and to remind yourself to manage and control your diabetes, click the yellow link below to add a small icon of our Defeat Diabetes® "Torch" logo to your desktop.  All you need to do after that is click on the "Torch" to open our website.  Remember, we're here for you!Add Us To Your Desktop! 

                                                                                                               

      We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the HON Foundation. Click to verify.We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the Health On the Net Foundation
Date of last update:  02/03/05
To contact Webmaster: webmaster@defeatdiabetes.org 

Translate this page into Spanish using FreeTranslation.com.

 © Copyright 2001 - 2004, Defeat Diabetes Foundation, Inc., All Rights Reserved