Poor Prenatal Nutrition
Permanently Damages Function of Insulin-producing Cells
posted March 7,
2005
Poor Prenatal Nutrition Permanently
Damages Function of Insulin-producing Cells in the Pancreas
The bottom line is that if you don't have delivery of enough nutrients from the
mother to the baby, the baby's pancreatic cells will be programmed abnormally
and sets the stage for type 2 diabetes later in life.
Scientists at Joslin Diabetes Center have discovered one reason why infants
with low birth weight have a high potential of developing type 2 diabetes later
in life. In studies of mice, the researchers found that poor prenatal nutrition
impairs the pancreas's ability to later secrete enough insulin in response to
blood glucose.
"The bottom line is that if you don't have delivery of enough nutrients from
the mother to the baby, the baby's pancreatic cells will be programmed
abnormally," said principal investigator Mary-Elizabeth Patti, M.D., Assistant
Investigator in Joslin's Research Section on Cellular and Molecular Physiology
and Assistant Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. "The effect
doesn't show up until later on -- usually not until adolescence or adulthood.
"Many people believe we don't have much of a prenatal nourishment problem in the
United States," she added. "But poor nutrition of a developing baby can occur in
many ways other than inadequate nutrition of the mother. It also can occur with
abnormal development of the placenta and its blood vessels, or high blood
pressure, which damages vessels." In addition, many other factors can result in
intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight.
The CDC reports that 314,077 low birth weight babies were born in 2002,
representing 7.8 percent of the births that year, the highest level reported in
more than three decades.
The Joslin study, reinforces what scientists have known from previous studies in
humans: Infants with low birth weight -- typically defined as under five and
one-half pounds -- have a higher risk for developing type 2 diabetes.
To understand the reason, the researchers designed a series of experiments.
Using ordinary mice that were not inbred or genetically altered in any way, they
mated females with males, dating the day of their pregnancy, which lasts three
weeks. They separated the mothers into two groups. The control group ate as much
chow as they wanted during the entire pregnancy. The other group also was fully
nourished during the first two weeks but undernourished during the third week,
restricted to only half the amount. It had a dramatic effect. At birth, their
babies weighed 23 percent less than the control group.
After delivery, all babies nursed and all mothers ate a full diet. "By the time
the babies were weaned, at three weeks, the low-birth-weight group had caught up
with the others, something we see in human babies too," said Dr. Patti. "They
looked and acted the same. There was nothing outwardly different about them."
The two groups of offspring ate the same chow diet, maintained a similar weight,
and neither group was allowed to become overweight, eliminating this common risk
factor for diabetes. The only difference was that the mothers had been fed
differently during the final week.
As the young mice matured, the researchers tested their blood glucose (sugar)
after meals. At age 2 months, the results were similar between the two groups.
But over time, differences began to unfold. When 4 months old (comparable to
human adolescence), the low-birth-weight babies began showing higher levels of
blood glucose. "By 6 months, these levels had spiked abnormally, to 500 mg/dl --
the equivalent of serious, full-blown diabetes in humans," Dr. Patti said.
Normally, insulin levels rise or drop in response to glucose levels, keeping
everything in balance. But diabetes is a complex metabolic disorder with
numerous players such as high levels of blood glucose, cholesterol and other
lipids. "The challenge is to figure out which factors are a primary cause of
diabetes and which are a consequence, said Dr. Patti. "In our study, we needed
to find out what was happening in these mice, before they got the problem."
Their insulin levels provided a clue. In the prenatally undernourished mice, the
insulin secretion stayed about the same, regardless of the glucose level in the
bloodstream. "That surprised us," Dr. Patti said. "The problem was not insulin
resistance. It had something to do with insulin secretion." By contrast, babies
who are born overweight (greater than 8 pounds) have higher risk of insulin
resistance, not a secretion problem. Something different was happening in the
experiment's low-birth-weight mice.
Did prenatal undernourishment cause the pancreas to not fully develop? The
researchers found no difference in pancreas size or numbers of pancreatic beta
cells, which produce insulin.
But cultures of the beta cells revealed the answer: the undernourished mice had
an abnormal way of responding to glucose. "They were somehow 'programmed' to
secrete a limited amount of insulin later in life, no matter what signal they
got from glucose," Dr. Patti said. "The impairment was permanent. It couldn't be
corrected even when the body caught up to normal weight."
Because studies of mice generally are good predictors of human biology, the
Joslin study has important implications. "People and their doctors need to
understand that prenatal undernourishment makes a person permanently at higher
risk for developing diabetes, so prenatal care is important," Dr. Patti said.
"Moreover, if someone was born with low weight, they need to pay special
attention to prevention tactics, including exercise and weight control to
minimize insulin resistance -- the other major factor involved in triggering
type 2 diabetes.
"In particular, someone who was a low-birth-weight baby can compound the risk of
developing diabetes by becoming overweight," she added. "The stage is set in two
ways: low insulin production coupled with resistance to insulin -- a double
whammy."
Source: Diabetes In Control.com: Diabetes, March 2005.