The glycemic index may be a beneficial tool in food
selection and meal planning, according to leading health experts who explored
the issues and scientific research related to the glycemic index at the
American Dietetic Association's Food & Nutrition Conference & Exhibition (FNCE).
The glycemic index or GI - one of the most talked about topics in nutrition
today - ranks foods based on the extent to which they raise blood sugar levels
over a 2 hour period. Foods with a low GI can result in a modest rise and fall
in blood sugar, which helps provide lasting energy.
The FNCE session entitled Emerging Role of Glycemic Index and Glycemic
Response: A Useful Tool? featured Patti Geil, MS, RD, Author and Certified
Diabetes Educator; Thomas Wolever, MD, PhD, internationally renowned expert in
carbohydrates and diabetes; and Professor of Nutritional Sciences and Medicine
at the University of Toronto; and David Grotto, RD, LD, ADA Spokesperson and
Director of Nutrition Education at the Block Medical Center in Evanston, IL.
The session was co-sponsored by
The Balance Bar Company.
While the glycemic impact of a food has been a topic of research for more than
20 years, it has only recently emerged as a potential tool for consumer use.
"Growing evidence suggests that moderating the glycemic response of foods may
have important health implications. "A thorough review and objective
interpretation of the scientific literature can enable nutrition professionals
to offer appropriate recommendations and practical applications for the
general public."
One of the pioneers in the development of the GI, Wolever presented an
in-depth overview of the scientific evidence related to GI. "While more
research is needed, diets with a low GI have been associated with potential
health benefits, particularly for active and health-conscious individuals,"
said Wolever. "Many other countries around the world have already adopted or
are adopting GI as a valuable tool when developing dietary guidelines. "
Grotto outlined science-based messages for communicating appropriate use of
GI. He also identified strategies for educating both consumers and health
professionals when using GI as a potential tool for nutrition education.
"Increasingly, health professionals are incorporating messages about the
glycemic index and putting emphasis on low GI foods when counseling patients,"
Grotto said. "While GI shouldn't be the only factor when evaluating foods, it
can be an additional tool for planning a nutritious diet."
In his presentation, Grotto suggested the following messages for registered
dietitians to use when counseling patients about the glycemic index:
-- GI can be a useful tool when planning a healthy diet, but should not be the
sole guide. Using general dietary recommendations found in the USDA Food Guide
Pyramid and the Dietary Guidelines for Healthy Americans can provide
additional assurance of nutritional adequacy.
-- Cultural differences and dietary preferences should be considered when
determining individual dietary strategies and the role of the GI.
-- Individuals should not limit food choices to only low glycemic response
foods when planning a healthy diet.
Source: Diabetes In Control.com.