posted 01/02/03
But those on other oral agents should be switched to insulin
before pregnancy or as soon as possible after conception, Dr. Martin N. Montoro
said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Diabetes Association.
More information is sorely needed about the possible effects of oral
glucose-lowering agents during pregnancy. Although type 2 diabetes is a growing
problem among women of childbearing age, there are virtually no prospective,
randomized data about the safety of commonly used oral diabetes drugs on the
developing fetus, said Dr. Montoro, professor of clinical medicine and ob.gyn.
at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Pregnant women have been routinely excluded from clinical trials, due largely to
liability concerns of pharmaceutical firms that might fund such trials, he said.
Yet abundant data clearly show that uncontrolled maternal diabetes is
teratogenic. It appears that in many cases, adverse fetal outcomes that have
been attributed to oral glucose-lowering agents—including various anomalies,
stillbirths, macrosomia, and neonatal hypoglycemia—were probably due to the
diabetes itself, he said.
Insulin works, of course, but it's not usually an attractive option for women
who are used to taking pills to control their diabetes.
Dr. Montoro offered his expert advice, based on mostly limited data from animal
studies, anecdotal reports, and retrospective reviews. In the best scenario, the
woman comes in for preconception counseling, allowing for optimization of
glucose control—down to a hemoglobin A1c level of less than one
standard deviation above the lab's normal mean—before pregnancy. Diet and
exercise are standard therapy; insulin should be prescribed if glucose levels
continue to be elevated.
If she has been taking oral agents, the dose should be adjusted to achieve
optimal diabetes control while on adequate contraception, then switched to
insulin once HbA1c is optimized and she's ready to become pregnant.
Unfortunately, the more common scenario is that the patient presents when she is
already pregnant. Some women will have stopped taking the drugs on their own
when they discovered they were pregnant. “It's very important to counsel these
patients that the risk of anomalies and other complications is probably related
to their diabetes, rather than the medications,” Dr. Montoro said.
But as a practical matter, none of these drugs are approved for use during
pregnancy. The limited data that are available suggest that glyburide is
probably safe throughout pregnancy, but all other agents should be switched to
insulin. Metformin and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are probably safe in early
pregnancy, but data are insufficient to recommend their use throughout
gestation.
Oral antidiabetes drugs got a bad name during pregnancy mainly from early
studies on the first-generation sulfonylureas tolbutamide and chlorpropamide. A
1962 paper reported 14 perinatal deaths in offspring of 22 women taking
chlorpropamide and 4 deaths in offspring of 17 women taking tolbutamide. There
were no congenital anomalies or neonatal hypoglycemia. All the women were in
poor glycemic control by today's standards, and the study was retrospective
(Diabetes 11[suppl.]:98-101, 1962).
That study has been widely quoted, even though those two agents are rarely used
any more, and there have been at least a dozen other studies published over the
last three decades that have found no abnormalities associated with
sulfonylureas, particularly the newer ones.
For example, a study that compared diet alone in 125 women during the first 8
weeks of pregnancy, oral agents (chlorpropamide, glyburide, or glipizide) in 147
women, and insulin in 60 women showed no significant difference in major or
minor congenital anomalies (Diabetes Care 18[11]:1446-51, 1995).
In the only randomized trial of oral hypoglycemic agents during pregnancy, there
were no differences in neonatal outcomes such as large for gestational age,
hypoglycemia, anomaly, or stillbirth between 201 women randomized to receive
glyburide after 8 weeks' gestation and 203 treated with insulin (N. Engl. J.
Med. 343[16]:1134-38, 2000).
Even fewer data are available for the other classes of diabetes drugs. One
retrospective review of 160 pregnancies found that 32% of women taking metformin
during pregnancy had preeclampsia, compared with 7% of those on sulfonylureas
and 10% of those on insulin. Stillbirths were also higher with metformin
(Diabetic Medicine 17[7]:507-11, 2000).
TZD data are limited to case reports, and most are of troglitazone, which is no
longer on the market. There is one case report on rosiglitazone and none on
pioglitazone. No ill effects from TZDs have been reported in human pregnancies,
but troglitazone was associated with fetal death and growth retardation during
mid to late gestation in animals. There are no pregnancy data for the oral
agents repaglinide or nateglinide, Dr. Montoro said.
Source: Diabetes In Control Dot Com.
January 2003 News Article Index
Home -
Table of
Contents -
Donate Now -
About
Diabetes -
Warning Signs -
Complications
- Screening Test -
Diabetes
Terms -
Site Search -
Meet
Mr. Diabetes® -
Wake Up And
Walk® Tour -
Latest News -
Headlines
& News Stories -
Health
& Fitness -
About Us -
FAQ
- Research Form -
-
Message Board -
Privacy
Policy -
Legal Notices
-
How to Contact Us
-
Comments form -
Suggestion Form
- Our E-Mail
Addresses -
Our Address and Phone
Numbers -
Links
-
Contact Us